🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our children's innocence". A law may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a proposal raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is provided. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful foundation," said one European lawmaker behind the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "based on robust evidence".

Previously, interest built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization set up by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to build tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," said a influential peer.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, action is largely happening at the state level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain figures to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations strike a more measured tone. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the policies of this nation and others show that governments globally are no longer willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.